Elkridge McDonald’s Denied Request for 40-Foot Sign

The Board of Appeals voted against the fast food franchise.

After nearly five hours of testimony and deliberation, McDonald’s officials did not get permission for the large sign they wanted to erect for their restaurant on Route 1 in Elkridge.

On July 12, the Board of Appeals denied request for the 40-foot freestanding sign it sought approval to build at 6225 Washington Boulevard.

McDonald's claimed need for the sign because cars traveling northbound on Route 1 cannot see the business due to topography, power lines and trees (including one tree that the neighboring planted in front of the current McDonald's sign).

“There is a less intrusive way potentially of them dealing with the problem,” said James Walsh, one of five members of the board. Walsh voted against the sign.

During a four-hour , Elkridge residents suggested a monument sign, or one that is affixed to the ground and close to the curb, as an alternative. 

Residents said this type of sign could provide the visibility McDonald’s was seeking without violating the streetscape guidelines established by the Route 1 Manual, a document created in 2004 to help in revitalizing the aging Route 1 corridor in part by reducing “visual clutter.” 

Although McDonald’s testified last week that a monument sign would not be visible to northbound traffic on Route 1, board members noted that the franchise did not present evidence supporting its claim.

Still, the board sympathized with the business’ visibility challenges.

“I can’t tell you how many times I’ve driven by the McDonald’s and blown right past it,” said board member James Howard, who said he passes by the fast food restaurant in Elkridge once a month.

Howard voted to approve the 40-foot sign. 

“I don’t think [a monument sign] would be visible,” he explained. “That said, at 40 feet, when the trees bloom, that sign wouldn’t be visible either.”

In the end, board members voted 3-2 to deny the request.

McDonald’s has 30 days to decide whether to appeal the decision, taking it up with the Circuit Court of Howard County.

Val McGuire July 13, 2011 at 01:23 PM
Well thank God 3 Board of Appeals members saw that this request was not suitable, particularly when other options are available. Businesses need to be community friendly. So, in light of this McD's change in philosophy, I'll be eating at Burger King from now on.
JBateman July 14, 2011 at 01:24 AM
Thanks Michele, Ray and GECA for keeping up with this. If the precedent is set for a extremely large sign, we will begin seeing them up and down Route 1. This would go directly against the Route 1 revitalization that is supposed to be in the pipeline. Thank you to the three Board of Appeals members who saw the wisdom in not setting a precedent.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »